Thanks for the catch, I missed it. I'll update it in my version for the next submission.
Hesham > -----Original Message----- > From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 8:26 AM > To: Soliman Hesham; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: On-link assumption refuses to go away > > > Hi Hesham, > The latest revision of RFC2461bis still contains the > on-link assumption > when no default routers are present. I do notice that the > text about the > on-link assumption in section 5.2 has been removed but the > following text > is present in section 6.3.6 regarding default router selection. > > 3) If the Default Router List is empty, assume that all > destinations are on-link as specified in Section 5.2. > > Should this be removed as well? > > Cheers > Suresh > > > =========================================================== This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. =========================================================== -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
