Hi,

A could of quick comments on draft-daniel-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-00.txt.

Editorial suggestion: please switch to use XML2RFC.  Pretty please!

Two bigger issues:

1) This document doesn't seem to take a stance what happens when/if the host
has multiple routers (whether on the same or different interfaces), and some
of them have O/M bits set and some others not.  Would that lead to a
set-unset-set-unset loop, with triggering?  If heard on another interface,
should that affect how DHCPv6 is run?

2) The treatment of M/O flag "transitions" and the initial state after a
reboot is not 100% unambiguous.

In section 6.0 you said:

                          The host should reset these flags depending
       on the information received in RAs when the host is rebooting.

...

       Policy 2: The host SHOULD invoke Stateful DHCPv6 for address 
       autoconfiguration (along with other configuration information)
       if and only if it sees an RA changing the M bit from unset to set.

==> but in previous sections, you used the wording "from unset to set";
this requires that there is, in fact a transition -- that these are always
initialized to zero.  

The latter wording ("RA changing the M bit") is also confusing because
"M bit" has typically been considered as a property of the routing
advertisement, not a global variable of the node.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to