Mark,
I don't think "wait and see" is a cop-out, actually. Since these addresses are by definition useless on the Internet in general, I think local pragmatic decision taking is the best way to find out what we *should* recommend. It's not obvious to me that a typical corporate deployment of ULAs will need any reverse lookup at all. It may simply be a non-problem (apart from the load problem that as112 addresses as I understand it).
Brian
Mark Andrews wrote:
Mark,
At 03:16 PM 11/29/2004, Mark Andrews wrote:
Section 4.4 DNS Issues
This sections appears to be a real cop out.
It is perfectly natural for clients to want to make queries and have these addresses returned from the DNS.
There is a wide range of views on what is appropriate for putting these addresses in the global DNS. For now, I think the best way to move this document forward is to leave it as is and wait until we have operational experience. Once there is some operational experience it would be good if V6OPS or DNSOPS wrote a document about the best way to do it.
Bob
I think there is plenty of IPv4 experience that translates to
this area. This is basically saying that the as112 should be
the default treatment for these reverse zones.
See http://www.as112.net/
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
