On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 10:23:57AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > How interesting! www.%33com.com also fails, so it isn't even > being kicked into numeric addresses that does it - the parsers > simply don't interpret the escape at that point. > > So they're all broken?
Either all these implementations are broken or the specification which requires % escape processing on the host portion of a URI (because it makes the URI grammer look nicer). It actually does not buy us anything to do % escape processing on the host name and with internationalized domain names, implementations might have even more reasons to treat the host portion of URIs in special ways. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------