Elwyn
At 10:43 12/01/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elwyn & Pekka,
> In that case, I guess (d) would have to be reworded to better match > reality, for example, from: > > (d) Otherwise, the node's routing table must be examined to > determine which interface will be used to transmit the message > to its destination, and a unicast address belonging to that > interface MUST be used as the Source Address of the message. > > to: > > (d) Otherwise, the source address is determined by the same > way as for any other packet the node originates. > > ... > > This prevents the problem with no global address on the interface, > because the code will should pick a source address of the same or > larger scope for the reply..
I think that Pekka's suggestion looks reasonable.
John
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
