> > It all makes sense now :) Thanks for being patient :) > > What about we replace "This document obsoletes RFC 2463=20 > [RFC-2463]." text with "This document obsoletes RFC 2463=20 > [RFC-2463] and RFC 2780 [RFC-2780]" ?
Oops - This document obsoletes RFC 2463 [RFC2463] and *updates* RFC 2780 [RFC-2780]. With that proviso, yes! > > and Margaret adds a note to the RFC editor in her > writeup. > > Both these action should take care of your second > comment. Right ? Yes! > > I am still trying to address your first comment > about ESP/AH RFCs. Okay, I'll await that. > > Regards > Mukesh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
