In 4. Healing of Network Partitions <draft-ietf-zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-17.txt> states: Hosts on disjoint network links may configure the same IPv4 Link- Local address. If these separate network links are later joined or bridged together, then there may be two hosts which are now on the same link, trying to use the same address.
To my mind this also will apply to IPv6, allthough the probility that 2 hosts will use the same address will be much smaller than in IPv4. But in contrast to <draft-ietf-zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-17.txt> IPv6 ND provides no means to dedect the situation and handle it in any way. Is this correct ? Best regards Peter -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
