Dear All, I totally agree with Tim Chown's observation.The issue of ostracisation or betterstil limitations to who gains access to the afore-mentioned should be citically looked into.
Sincerely, Doo Timbir. 08036577004[mob.] --- Tim Chown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:52:26AM +0100, Tim Chown > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:39:25PM -0500, Stephen > Sprunk wrote: > > > > > > I also believe that we should be watching the > IPv6 PI policy proposal at > > > ARIN et al; if the ARIN proposal is approved > (and other RIRs follow suit), I > > > see little reason to continue work on > centrally-assigned ULAs. > > > > I disagree. The ARIN proposal seems to be 'PI for > any ASN holder' in which > > case > > > > a) this will limit who gets the PI space to large > organisations > > b) be limited by the 16-bit ASN space (and may > create a land rush) > > c) be useless to the small end site that wants to > use unique ULAs > > > > But I may have misunderstood the ARIN proposal :) > > Following up to myself, the proposal in fact says > 'sites who could qualify > for an ASN'. But that does limit who could use > this source for PI. > > -- > Tim/::1 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
