There has been no comment on this issue. I'll simply close it without taking any action on the document (as proposed below).
> In your IESG comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-07.txt, you said: > > > There is a lot of normative dependency on the recycling DS of > > Neighbory Discovery which not even in the tracker yet, so are > > there some instabilities? > > The normative dependency on the recycling DS (2461bis) is > intentional. As far as I understand, the goal is to update both > RFC2461 and RFC2462 simultaneously with consistent changes. So, if > one document is behind the other in standardization status, there is > no other choice than waiting for the former. > > I don't know when that will happen, though. Perhaps we need > simultaneous approval from the IESG for both documents; perhaps we can > get approval separately and just need to be synchronized at the final > publication procedure... I slightly recall Margaret saied she would > took care of the timing issue. > > In any event, I don't think this "discuss" comment does not require a > change in the document, and I'm planning just to close this issue > soon. If I miss something (particularly if you want a document change > on this matter), please let me know. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
