> Discuss comment from Allison Mankin: > > Was there an analysis of the configuration consistency rule > (section 5.6) of accepting the most recent information, while > trying to secure both DHCPv6 and ND/addrconf (SEND)?
We seem to reach a consensus on this issue through a discussion at the wg list. See the thread starting at: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg04823.html This ticket is closed with the proposed change, which will appear in the next version of the document. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
