On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 05:02:01PM +0200, Stig Venaas wrote:
> 
> Too late I think, it's already in rfc ed queue. However 3484 should be
> updated anyway to remove site-locals and something about ULA could then
> be added. This would be a trivial change.
> 
> Note that the ULA draft, draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-09.txt is
> vague regarding scopes:

Exactly - two issues here - one is removing some 'loose' language from
the ULA draft, the other is a 3484 update to consider ULAs in place of
site locals.

The former could be an 'editorial' change, if meaning is preserved?

-- 
Tim/::1



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to