I have just been reviewing the latest version of the name lookups draft and
checking the IANA considerations for that draft triggered me to look across the
IANA considerations for all the ICMPv6 stuff we have in progress at present.
The conclusions are:
- icmp-v3 supersedes section 7 in RFC2780 and should be noted as updating
RFC2780
- The IANA considerations in 2461bis need a complete rewrite
- Reference icmp-v3 instead of RFC2780
- to explicitly say which ICMPv6 types it is continuing the registration
for
- define the registry and the policy for ND options
- to say explicitly which options it is defining/continuing
- Some minor changes to the name-lookups draft are covered in a separate email
on its last call
- 2462bis and the nd-proxy draft correctly say they have no IANA requirements.
- ipv6-router-selection is correct - it will be automagically be updated to
ref 2461bis hopefully!
- privacy-addrs-v2 has no IANA considerations section - it needs a null one.
- MLDv1 has no IANA considerations section but MLDv2 is fine although it doesn't
refer to RFC2780
- SEND (RFC3971) and mipv6 (RFC3775) are all in order although they don't refer
to RFC2780
Regards,
Elwyn
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Hi Elwyn, can you kindly re-review this to see if your points have
been addressed?
Thanks
Brian
ID Tracker wrote:
New version (-07) has been submitted for
draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-07.txt.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-07.txt
Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
IETF Secretariat.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
