Hi Samita, From: Samita Chakrabarti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:22:40 -0700 (PDT) > > > > I think specifying IPV6_PREFER_DST_XXX doesn't have any meaning, > > because the destination address has already been chosen in > > getaddrinfo(). > > Are you suggesting to drop all the IPV6_PREFER_DST_*SCOPE socket-option > flags ? I'll discuss this with my co-authors of this draft.
Yes, that is what I meant. > Does any implementor in this list have any objection on dropping > the above socket option? Though I only know the internal implementation of BSD networking systems, at least we don't need those socket options (related to choosing a destination address) for the BSD systems. I don't know other implementations. I'm not sure if there are any implementations which can utilize those socket options. I think inputs from other implementors should be helpful. Regards, --- Keiichi SHIMA IIJ Research Laboratory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KAME Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
