On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:39:37PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 27-jul-2005, at 16:27, JINMEI Tatuya / ???????????? wrote: > > >>The flags are just hints, the host can always ignore > >>them. If it is inappropriate to try to use DHCP when flags > >>are zero, let it be so. Similarly if the flag(s) is (are) set, > >>the host can always ignore. > > >Yes, this is my understanding, too, and I think we don't have to > >revisit this agreement. > > Are we having this discussion now, or later/somewhere else? If so, > when/where? > > If we're going to have the discussion, we need to bite the bullet and > arrive at some solid conclusions. Passing arguments back and forth > for a while and then leaving it up in the air doesn't help.
There is a 15 min slot in the IPv6 WG agenda for Tuesday, and then a small slot in DHC on Thursday where the result (assuming we get one) of Tuesday can be discussed in the DHC context. -- Tim/::1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
