Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi Folks,
I think the node requirements document needs to be advanced as well
before we should move the base specs to Full Standard as one cannot
easily figure out what she/he should do to be IPv6 compliant. e.g. If I
implement just RFC2460 and not RFC2461 and RFC2462 am I still compliant?
Cheers
Suresh
That isn't necessary. The node requirements draft is indeed the one that
summarizes what you need to support, but it can refer equally well to
a DS or a Standard document. It isn't a compliance document.
What is more tricky is for a Standard to refer normatively "down"
to a DS (or PS) - that is not normally allowed. If you think this
is silly, please join the newtrk WG.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
