DoD would find this information helpful.
Thanks,
Shawn Smith
INTEROP/JITC
Ft. Huachuca, AZ
520-538-5220


-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Hain
To: 'Greg Daley'; ipv6@ietf.org
Cc: 'Fred Baker'
Sent: 8/3/2005 6:04 AM
Subject: RE: How ready is IPv6 - do we need to describe it?

This is the charter of the v6ops WG. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Greg Daley
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:56 PM
> To: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: How ready is IPv6 - do we need to describe it?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I was chatting with Keith Moore, and think that it may
> help to provide guidance (a BCP) on which components
> are stable and reliable for IPv6 deployment.
> 
> Perhaps it could be seen as a wrap-up for the IPv6 WG.
> 
> It may be possible to indicate the standard levels
> at the time of writing, and indicate if there were
> known remanant issues (or uncertainty) with a particular
> protocol.
> 
> This would give a clear idea of how far down the path
> to usability the suite of v6 tools is, so that operators
> can consider the state of the art before going ahead
> with deployment.
> 
> Does anyone have an opinion on if it would be helpful
> or hurtful?
> 
> Greg
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to