Seems to me the WG ought to work through these questions: 1. Is RFC 3484 adequate to solve the address selection problem?
My guess is "no", because of its references to site-local addresses and other deficiencies discussed in this thread. If the answer is no, the first step for the WG would be to update RFC 3484. 2. Is there a requirement for automated/administered management of the address selection policy specified in RFC 3484 (or RFC 3484bis) in hosts? Seems like there is enough interest in this thread for policy management to warrant WG activity... 3. What are the right semantics and the right vehicle for providing management? TBD, once we get answers to 1 and 2? - Ralph -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
