Hi Marcelo, ----- Original Message ----- From: marcelo bagnulo braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Saturday, August 13, 2005 0:50 am Subject: Re: Solutions for distributing RFC 3484 address selection policies > Hi Greg, > > El 12/08/2005, a las 2:14, Greg Daley escribió: > > Is this what people want to use the proposed option for, though? > > Or are they just interested in providing an information service > about> the advertised prefixes? > > > > I guess that it also would make sense to provide label/preference > information about destination prefixes/addresses i.e. not only > providing information about the prefixes available in the link, > but also about remote prefixes
I don't have a ready-made solution for that one, since although there are proposals for route information options in IPv6 ND, They only have 6 bits free (in two blocks of 3 bits). http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-router-selection- 07.txt I'd guess in that case, only the label would be required, since the routing destination already has its own preferences (for routing purposes though, not destination address selection...) Greg -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
