All done, except:
> define the policy for the Neighbour Discovery options (since > this hasn't > previously been properly defined). => Did you mean the policy of allocating new option numbers? > - it should probably explicitly define the ICMP types and ND options > which are being continued from RFC2461 as they don't have an > explicit > registration in RFC2461. => I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. What do you mean by "don't have an explicit registration in RFC2461."? Hesham > > Regards, > Elwyn > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > =========================================================== This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. =========================================================== -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
