As there have been no follow-ups, let me just say I agree with all of
what you wrote here, and (IMHO) I'd answer "No, I don't see
sufficiently strong justification" to the following:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, JINMEI Tatuya / ¿ÀÌÀãºÈ wrote:
[...]
So my first question toward the possible next step is: do we need the
"stronger and non-default indication of non-availability"?
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
