Hi all,

Firstly, according to a minutes of the last shim6 meeting,
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05nov/minutes/shim6.html
this issue of revising RFC3484 was passed to AD.
I want to know if this proposal was arranged by AD.

IMHO, these new functions look very effective and desirable
to solve address selection problems. At the same time,
however, inserting these rules into RFC3484 seems to involve
such a tough modification to protocol stack.

I suppose we should separate some already-raised issues about
updating RFC3484 from these radical issues.

-- 
Arifumi Matsumoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to