I'll take a look at all of this on Monday and work text up. I'll send the text to the WG, and if there is agreement, I can make the updates during AUTH48.
John >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Dave Thaler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 06 January, 2006 23:31 >To: Loughney John (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) >Cc: ipv6@ietf.org >Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt > >Here's another one: >RFC2893 is now obsoleted by RFC4213 > >Section 6.l.1 says: >"RFC 2893 is currently being updated." > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >Of >> Dave Thaler >> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 3:05 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org >> Subject: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt >> >> The draft in the RFC-editors queue now references obsoleted (as of >last >> month) RFCs. Specifically: >> RFC2401 is now obsoleted by RFC4301 >> RFC2402 is now obsoleted by RFC4302 >> RFC2404 is now obsoleted by RFC4305 >> RFC2406 is now obsoleted by RFC4303, RFC4305 >> RFC2407,2408,2409 are now obsoleted by RFC4306 >> >> Also two statements in section 8 are now obsolete as a result: >> "RFC-2401 is being updated by the IPsec Working Group." >> "RFC-2406 and RFC 2402 are being updated by the IPsec Working >Group." >> >> Can these be updated? >> >> -Dave >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> ipv6@ietf.org >> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
