Hi,
We (me and George Neville-Neil) haveve just submitted an I-D on type 0
routing header processing. In the meantime, it's available here:
http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/ietf/draft-savola-ipv6-rtheader-00.txt
Its approach is "disable by default, but type 0 routing header is
still a part of a compliant IPv6 implementation". It identifies other
potential approaches as well as well as lists some open issues.
Joe's draft suggests deprecating type 0, so these are somewhat
different starting points. Both seemed to gain significant support in
the WG, so I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea to have two
drafts. That way the WG can probably choose better which approach to
pursue.
[[ Personally I don't have a strong opinion whether we should disable
or deprecate. Any rough consensus works for me.. ]]
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
