> Would it make you feel more certain if the ULA-Cs were > self-generated by sites exactly as in (RFC4193, Section 3.2) > and then "registered" with a central authority that would > register the address as long as it is not a duplicate? I > don't think ('draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central', Section 3.2) > currently says that, but it seems like it would result in > a scenario that is no worse than for RFC4193 yet with a > central authority accountable for certifying uniqueness.
Certainly not. I have even less confidence that everyone else will play by this rule than I do in the competence of the putative central registry. The chance of a collision between randomly-generated prefixes is REALLY, REALLY, REALLY small -- MUCH smaller than the probability of any real world event you would care to cite. -- George Mitchell > That said, I would be astonished if this idea has not been > entertained and debated before. > > Thanks - Fred > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------