On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 01:33:29PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > It really should be up to the *user* of the ULA-C addresses > to decide if they want to provide more than NXDOMAIN to > interested parties on the Internet. We shouldn't be > arbitarially limiting functionality if it is technically > possible to provide that functionality.
and this is the crux of my previous posts supporting reverse delegation to a global unicast address. we want to provide all the possibilties within the limit that it doesnt' interfere with Other People's Networks. delegating reverse authority, including it in whois, allowing/including them in radb networks are all flexible tools. no one says you have to use them. -- - bill fumerola / [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------