[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which, in turn, supports real-world use of autoconf on /80's,
I wasn't aware that there was such a huge demand for autoconf. Reading
the trade press leads me to think the opposite.
Did you not see my posting, on the results of the "straw poll"?
Between "all auto" and "mixed" (meaning static + autoconf hosts on one
site, or even one subnet),
the total was >> 90%.
Granted, that was a relatively small sample set, but, well, the globally
deployed
IPv6 universe is a small sample set, currently. (837 prefixes or
thereabouts.)
BTW - reality trumps the trade press, as a general rule.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
