Prakash and Suresh, Another consideration when using privacy addresses is that it is unwieldy to use DDNS map them to an FQDN. Since they are to be private, this may not be an issue.
Best Regards, Jeffrey Dunn Info Systems Eng., Lead MITRE Corporation. (301) 448-6965 (mobile) -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 6:13 PM To: Prakasha Shetty Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: RFC 3041/4941, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Auto configuration in IPv6" Hi Prakash, The privacy addresses are no different than any other unicast addresses. The only impact may be on routers performing ingress filtering as described in section 7 of RFC4941. Cheers Suresh On 09-06-12 08:36 AM, Prakasha Shetty wrote: > Hi, > > By having this feature of generating temporary address and make that > address for new client connections, which are all features/tools (ex : > tcpdump, router tools etc ) are affected and in what manner ? > > Thanks & > Regards > Prakash > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
