On 28/07/09 5:29 PM, "Francis Dupont" <francis.dup...@fdupont.fr> wrote:
> In your previous mail you wrote:
>
> Thoughts?
>
> => I am strongly against changing all IPv6 implementations.
> IMHO the simplest solution is to drop UDP packets with zero checksums
> (as far as I know all IPv4 implementations use non-zero checksums
> per default and some UDP applications, for instance DNS, work far
> better with non-zero checksums. BTW it is an easy condition to check
> in firewalls).
=> I agree with Francis. SIIT talks about this case and addresses it the way
Francis suggests. Let's not re-invent the wheel, this is a known issue.
Hesham
>
> Regards
>
> francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
