Brian and Shane,
I read the draft. It is well written. Here are some comments: Text: o At intermediate router(s) that perform ECMP or LAG for packets whose source address is a TEP, the hash SHOULD minimally include the triple {dest addr, source addr, flow label} to meet the [RFC3697] rules. In practice, since the routers are assumed to be unaware of tunneled traffic, this means adding the flow label to the existing 5-tuple hash of the outer IP header. o At intermediate router(s) that perform ECMP or LAG for packets whose source address is a TEP, the hash MUST minimally include the triple {dest addr, source addr, flow label} to meet the [RFC3697] rules. In practice, since the routers are assumed to be unaware of tunneled traffic, this means intermediate router(s) SHOULD add the flow label to the existing 5-tuple hash of the outer IP header. Two paragraphs are the same except one has "hash SHOULD" and another has "hash MUST". Text: It might be possible to make this classifier stateless, by using a suitable modulo(N) hash of the inner IP header's 5-tuple as the pseudo-random value. The document text uses N in referring N paths. It causes a confusion in using modulo(N) here. It should be modulo (2**20) for flow ID. Cheers, Lucy
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------