Lucy,

On 2010-06-16 09:46, Yong Lucy wrote:
> Brian and Shane,
> 
>  
> 
> I read the draft. It is well written. Here are some comments: 

...
> Two paragraphs are the same except one has "hash SHOULD" and another has
> "hash MUST".

Oops.

> 
>  
> 
> Text:
> 
> It might be possible to make this classifier stateless, by using a
> 
>       suitable modulo(N) hash of the inner IP header's 5-tuple as the
> 
>       pseudo-random value.
> 
>  
> 
> The document text uses N in referring N paths. It causes a confusion in
> using modulo(N) here.  It should be modulo (2**20)

No, in the math notation I learned, modulo(N) is what we mean - the remainder
when the quantity is divided by N in integer artithmetic.

   Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to