I support this too. > -----Original Message----- > From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shane > Amante > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 11:23 PM > To: Brian Haberman > Cc: IPv6 WG Mailing List > Subject: Re: Consensus call on > adopting:draft-arifumi-6man-rfc3484-revise-03.txt > > I support this becoming a WG doc. > > -shane > > > On Jul 27, 2010, at 19:14 GMT+02:00, Brian Haberman wrote: > > All, > > As noted in today's session of 6MAN, the chairs are soliciting > > input on adopting: > > > > Title : Things To Be Considered for RFC 3484 Revision > > Author(s) : A. Matsumoto, et al. > > Filename : draft-arifumi-6man-rfc3484-revise-03.txt > > Pages : 13 > > Date : 2010-07-12 > > > > as a 6MAN working group document. Please state your opinion, positive > > or negative, on adopting this draft by August 21, 2010. > > > > Regards, > > Brian & Bob > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > ipv6@ietf.org > > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
