Hi Thomas,

The most recent version of the 

  Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers

draft is utilising RFC4191 Route Information Options to propagate
routing information to end-nodes for the internal network. I was
wondering if support for those should now be included in this revision
of the node requirements draft?

diff -
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-08.txt


Regards,
Mark.


On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:44:56 -0500
Thomas Narten <nar...@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> 6man chairs:
> 
> A new version of the node requirements document has been
> submitted. This one addresses all known outstanding issues. The
> authors believe it is ready for WGLC.
> 
> There are a number of changes in the last two versions of the
> document. They include:
> 
> > 17.  Appendix: Changes from -06 to -07
> > 
> >    1.  Added recommendation that routers implement Section 7.3 and 7.5
> >        of RFC 3775.
> >    2.  "IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS Configuration" (RFC
> >        6106) has been published.
> >    3.  Further clarifications to the MLD recommendation.
> >    4.  "Extended ICMP to Support Multi- Part Messages" [RFC4884] added
> >        as a MAY.
> >    5.  Added pointer to subnet clarification document (RFC 5942).
> >    6.  Added text that "IPv6 Host-to-Router Load Sharing" [RFC4311]
> >        SHOULD be implemented
> >    7.  Added reference to RFC5722 (Overlapping Fragments), made it a
> >        MUST to implement.
> >    8.  Made  "A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation"
> >        [RFC5952] a SHOULD. 
> > 
> > 18.  Appendix: Changes from -05 to -06
> > 
> >    1.  Completely revised IPsec/IKEv2 section.  Text has been discussed
> >    by 6man and saag.
> > 
> >    2.  Added text to introduction clarifying that this document applies
> >    to general nodes and that other profiles may be more specific in
> >    their requirements
> > 
> >    3.  Editorial cleanups in Neighbor Discovery section in particular.
> >    Text made more crisp.
> > 
> >    4.  Moved some of the DHCP text around.  Moved stateful address
> >    discussion to Section 5.8.5.
> > 
> >    5.  Added additional nuance to the redirect requirements w.r.t.
> >    default configuration setting.
> 
> Let's get this one done and sent to the IESG!
> 
> Thomas
>  
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to