The changes in this version are basically: - clarified that this is not a formal update of RFC 3697
- clarified text about domains exporting inappropriate labels There are no changes of the intended technical meaning, since as far as we can tell, most of the WG is OK with current technical content. Also see previous replies to comments: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg13253.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg13159.html Brian + Sheng + Shane -------- Original Message -------- Subject: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-01.txt Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:45:01 -0800 From: internet-dra...@ietf.org To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org CC: ipv6@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. Title : Update to the IPv6 flow label specification Author(s) : S. Amante, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-01.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2011-01-10 Various published proposals for use of the IPv6 flow label are incompatible with its existing specification in RFC 3697. Furthermore, very little practical use is made of the flow label, partly due to some uncertainties about the correct interpretation of the specification. This document describes and motivates proposed changes to the specification in order to clarify it, making it clear what types of usage are possible, and to introduce some additional flexibility. It does not formally update RFC 3697. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-01.txt -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
