WG,

I believe this version is ready to advance to the IESG.

>From the changes section:

>    17.1.  Appendix: Changes from -09 to -10
> 
>    1.  With changes in requirements for IPsec and Routing Headers,
>        clarified language regarding processing of unknown options, and
>        removed paragraph lising which extension headers were required to
>        be implemented.

Above changes are in Section 5.1.

>    2.  Removed "RFC4292-bis" from title.
>    3.  Expanded the text on Jumbograms.
>    4.  Changed recommendation of DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD.
>    5.  Expanded the text on RFC4191, and changed recommendation from MAY
>        to SHOULD.

The last 3 changes have recently been discussed on the mailing list.

Thomas

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to