Does anyone object to switching this draft from BCP to Standards Track? (See Pete Resnick's comments below.)
It is on this Thursday's IESG agenda. Brian Carpenter -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Pete Resnick's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-04: (with DISCUSS) ... > On 2011-07-12 03:09, Pete Resnick wrote: >> Pete Resnick has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-04: Discuss ... >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Section 3 of this document (the main section) seems like protocol to me. >> (For example, "Inner packets MUST be encapsulated in an outer IPv6 packet >> whose source and destination addresses are those of the tunnel end points >> (TEPs)".) Therefore, I see no reason for this not to be on the Standards >> Track. It seems like it has interoperability impacts and gives normative >> implementation guidance. >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
