Le 27/07/2011 00:05, Joel Jaeggli a écrit :
If you're commenting on v6nd draft I don't think we have any intention of
connecting ~1.8 * 10^19 hosts to a subnet...
Yes, commenting on the v6nd draft.
Listening to the disxcussion it so sounde to me that these were ND
optimizations such as to support 2^64 nodes in a subnet.
Alex
On Jul 26, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions) and only for anglo-saxons.
2^64 is exabytes of memory (not giga, nor tera, nor peta).
I am not sure you look at adapting nd for these figures.
Alex
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
