On 8/9/11 5:51 PM, Kerry Lynn wrote: > RFC 3306 states: > > > "The scope of the unicast-prefix based multicast address MUST NOT > exceed the scope of the unicast prefix embedded in the multicast > address." > > > I'd just like to verify my interpretation that site-local multicast addresses > > MAY be formed from ULA prefixes? If so, should a particular value
Yes, there is no issue with using a ULA prefix to form a unicast-prefix based multicast address with site-local scope. > > (e.g. 0x0000) be used as the subnet ID portion of the prefix? > What you use in the subnet portion of the ULA is really up to your use case. Regards, Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
