----- Original Message -----

> From: Arifumi Matsumoto <a...@arifumi.net>
> To: François-Xavier Le Bail <fx.leb...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2011 12:56 AM
> Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for your suggestion.
> 
> , and also we should also mention about Reserved IPv6 Subnet Anycast 
> Addresses ?
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2526

Hi,

I had a look at RFC 2526.

It's seems it's the same case than SRaa, but I have no practical experience 
with such a reserved subnet anycast address.

has someone an experience with these ?

François-Xavier

> 
> 2011/11/7 François-Xavier Le Bail <fx.leb...@yahoo.com>:
>> 
>>  Hi,
>> 
>>  The draft has taken into account anycast addresses.
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05#section-2.6
>> 
>>  It remains to handle the special case of Subnet-Router anycast address.
>>  (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.6.1)
>>  "The Subnet-Router anycast address is intended to be used for
>>  applications where a node needs to communicate with any one of the
>>  set of routers."
>> 
>>  So, I think a SRaa must be excluded from the candidate set of source 
> address
>>  for a new communication.
>>  The SRaa as source address must be reserved for a reply to a packet sent to 
> this SRaa.
>> 
>>  Text proposal (to add section 2.6) :
>>  "As an exception, a Subnet-Router anycast address MUST NOT be included 
> in the
>>  candidate set of source address when initiating communication.
>>  The Subnet-Router anycast address as source address MUST be used in a
>>  reply to a packet sent to this Subnet-Router anycast address".
>> 
>>  Thanks,
>>  François-Xavier
>> 
>> 
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>  From: "internet-dra...@ietf.org" 
> <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
>>>  To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
>>>  Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
>>>  Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 12:52 AM
>>>  Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt
>>> 
>>>  A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
>>>  This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the 
> IETF.
>>> 
>>>      Title           : Update to RFC 3484 Default Address Selection for 
> IPv6
>>>      Author(s)       : Arifumi Matsumoto
>>>                            Jun-ya Kato
>>>                            Tomohiro Fujisaki
>>>                            Tim Chown
>>>      Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt
>>>      Pages           : 12
>>>      Date            : 2011-10-31
>>> 
>>>     RFC 3484 describes algorithms for source address selection and for
>>>     destination address selection.  The algorithms specify default
>>>     behavior for all Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) implementations.
>>>     This document specifies a set of updates that modify the algorithms
>>>     and fix the known defects.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>>> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt
>>> 
>>>  Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>  ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>> 
>>>  This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
>>> 
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt
>>>  --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>  IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>  ipv6@ietf.org
>>>  Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>>  --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>  --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>  ipv6@ietf.org
>>  Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>  --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to