On 2012-04-06 22:16, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
> Just obsessing over this:
> 
> In the ULA RFC and postings, people always use the fc00:: prefix as an 
> example, it seems. But according to RFC 4193, the 8th bit in the first octet 
> must be set to 1, to indicate "local," at least until someone figures out how 
> to use a non-local ULA scheme.
> 
> So in fact, the first octet will always be fd, yes?
> 
> Just obsessing on a Good Friday.

The ULA prefix is fc00::/7 but indeed all prefixes created under
RFC 4193 are under fd00::/8.

The filtering rule in a border router needs to be on fc00::/7
to include a hypothetical future ULA scheme under fc00::/8.

Quoting prefixes without the prefix length isn't such a good idea.

    Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to