On 2012-04-06 22:16, Manfredi, Albert E wrote: > Just obsessing over this: > > In the ULA RFC and postings, people always use the fc00:: prefix as an > example, it seems. But according to RFC 4193, the 8th bit in the first octet > must be set to 1, to indicate "local," at least until someone figures out how > to use a non-local ULA scheme. > > So in fact, the first octet will always be fd, yes? > > Just obsessing on a Good Friday.
The ULA prefix is fc00::/7 but indeed all prefixes created under RFC 4193 are under fd00::/8. The filtering rule in a border router needs to be on fc00::/7 to include a hypothetical future ULA scheme under fc00::/8. Quoting prefixes without the prefix length isn't such a good idea. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------