> For IPv6 one could perhaps use RAs? Tina
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stig Venaas [mailto:s...@venaas.com] > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 11:02 AM > To: Tina TSOU > Cc: p...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [pim] Comment on draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu? > > On 4/5/2012 1:44 PM, Tina TSOU wrote: > > Dear all, > > May the author of draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu ask people to read the > draft and provide comments? > > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu/ > > > > Thank you in advance. > > See the minutes I just posted if you like. > > My main comment is that MTU is important for other protocols too, and > also for traffic/data, so I'm wondering if it would be better to do it > with some more general protocol. Maybe BFD or in the IGP? > For IPv6 one could perhaps use RAs? > > Stig > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > Tina TSOU > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pim mailing list > > p...@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
