One (non-blocking) side comment to the discussion (contained within "draft-dec-6man-rs-access-harmful") that IPv6 RS messages are specified at present to avoid repetitive RS messages after a host's initial (re)initialisation period might be worth repeating.
On low bandwidth links (e.g. many commonly used radio links), it is very important to keep the ND traffic low, so that the link capacity can be used for actual user/data traffic. While it is great that some very recent IEEE 802.11 specifications enable higher link capacity wireless LAN segments, there remain many existing radio link technologies that are unlikely ever to have higher link capacity. First-responder radios are especially likely to have significantly constrained link capacity, for example. Yours, Ran -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
