> > Please take a look at Page13~22 at > http://fud.no/talks/20120417-RIPE64-The_Case_for_IPv6_Only_Data_Centres.pdf > > If a stateless translator maintains the binding information of > *src.IPv6->src.IPv4 address*, the essential feature of "Does not > require flows to flow bidirectionally across a single translator" > would lose. >
Exactly. I now understood what is meant by Stateless NAT64 reading the above presentation. It solves the reverse problem of IPv4-only client talking to IPv6-only server. Regards, Behcet -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
