Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6man-dad-proxy-05: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't see any discussion of the size of the Binding Table. In fact, it seems to be assumed to be "large enough". History shows that we are not good at guessing the value of "large enough" and certainly the application of this mechanism to VPNs makes this a little worrying. That probably means that the document needs to describe what happens when the Binding Table is full. Might be as simple as handling the failure case in 4.2.1. --- Shouldn't you describe some manageability considerations? What events should be logged? What access to the stored informaiton should be provided? (For example, should theoperator be able to read the Binding Table?) -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
