WG,

The submitted version is not yet addressing all the issues raised during
IESG review. This is testing the proposed direction without overworking
the details. Thus one thing this document definitely needs to be
improved at is the following:

- Security consideration comments raised
- The analysis of the impact on the inner traffic with UDP tunnels.
- Clear how the requirements are or can be meet with the general class
of UDP tunnel using protocols carrying IP or transport protocol.

Cheers

Magnus

On 2012-10-23 01:16, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>       Title           : UDP Checksums for Tunneled Packets
>       Author(s)       : Marshall Eubanks
>                           P.F. Chimento
>                           Magnus Westerlund
>       Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-05.txt
>       Pages           : 11
>       Date            : 2012-10-22
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document provides an update of the Internet Protocol version 6
>    (IPv6) specification (RFC2460) to improve the performance of IPv6 in
>    the use case when a tunnel protocol uses UDP with IPv6 to tunnel
>    packets.  The performance improvement is obtained by relaxing the
>    IPv6 UDP checksum requirement for suitable tunneling protocol where
>    header information is protected on the "inner" packet being carried.
>    This relaxation removes the overhead associated with the computation
>    of UDP checksums on IPv6 packets used to carry tunnel protocols and
>    thereby improves the efficiency of the traversal of firewalls and
>    other network middleboxes by such protocols.  We describe how the
>    IPv6 UDP checksum requirement can be relaxed in the situation where
>    the encapsulated packet itself contains a checksum, the limitations
>    and risks of this approach, and define restrictions on the use of
>    this relaxation to mitigate these risks.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-05
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-05
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to