Folks, draft-gont-6man-predictable-fragment-id has been around for a while. It was presented for the first time at the IETF 83 (Paris), and revised according to the comments received. It was then presented at IETF 84 (Vancouver)... but the working group was never polled for WG adoption.
At IETF 84, some folks argued that it would be great to have a general document that discussed the issue of "predictable IDs" in general... but quite a few folks also noted (both on-list and at the mike8 that that wouldn't relieve us from updating RFC2460 as appropriate. Meanwhile, we still have vulnerable implementations, and we have implementers taking the advice in this *individual* I-D, which IMO should be a wg item to represent the wg view on this topic. May I ask for the wg to be formally polled about adoption of this document as a wg item? I'm not sure why this hasn't happened in the last 10 months or so. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
