Hi, On 06.02.2013 17:20, Erik Hugne wrote: > RFC4291 is clear that packets destined to ff01::/16 must never leave > the local node, but what should be done if such packets are received > as a result from a broken implementation on the other side?
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send", Since the sending node obviously violated the 2nd part of Jon Postel's robustness principle, it should be ignored and dropped by the receiving system. Moreover, report the failure to the vendor of the broken implementation or fix it by yourself if possible ;-) Regards, Roland -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
