Hi, Arturo and all That was my mistake. I derived this draft from a template and forgot to change it. It should be "Informational", thanks for finding this bug.
B.R. Bing > -----Original Message----- > From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Arturo Servin > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 5:29 PM > To: ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: Re: SLAAC/DHCPv6 addr-conf operational gaps > > Dear authors, > > Very interesting document and very valuable to document the current > behavior of the A, M and O flags (that have caused some headaches to > some including myself when troubleshooting IPv6). > > I see that has been submitted as "Proposed Standard" but I failed to > find what you are proposing. > > Would it better to be submitted as "Informational" and then look how > to > indicate the correct behavior of the flags? or just as "Informational"? > > Regards. > as > > > On 26/02/2013 15:14, Liubing (Leo) wrote: > > Hi, 6man & v6ops > > > > We submitted a new draft to discuss the SLAAC/DHCPv6 interaction gaps. > > > > As we know there are several flags in RA messages regarding with the host > configuration behavior, which are A (Autonomous) flag, M (Managed) flag, > and O (Otherconfig) flag. > > For some reason, the host behavior of interpreting the flags is ambiguous > in the standard (mainly RFC4862). I presented a draft discussing M flag > behavior in 6man @ietf84, and there were some feedbacks arguing the same > issue. This draft analyzed all the three flags, and provided test result of > current implementations, it showed the behavior of different mainstream > desktop OSes have varied. The ambiguous and variation might cause > operational problems, such as renumbering (used to discuss in 6renum WG > and been documented in the WG drafts), cold start problem, and > management gaps .etc. > > > > Your review and comments would be appreciated very much. > > > > All the best, > > Bing > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] > >> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 5:52 PM > >> To: Liubing (Leo) > >> Cc: rbon...@juniper.net > >> Subject: New Version Notification for > >> draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt > >> > >> > >> A new version of I-D, draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt > >> has been successfully submitted by Bing Liu and posted to the > >> IETF repository. > >> > >> Filename: draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem > >> Revision: 01 > >> Title: DHCPv6/SLAAC Address Configuration Interaction Problem > >> Statement > >> Creation date: 2013-02-25 > >> Group: Individual Submission > >> Number of pages: 12 > >> URL: > >> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem- > >> 01.txt > >> Status: > >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem > >> Htmlized: > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01 > >> Diff: > >> > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01 > >> > >> Abstract: > >> This document analyzes the host behavior of DHCPv6/SLAAC > interaction > >> issue. It reviews the standard definition of the host behaviors and > >> provides the test results of current mainstream implementations. > Some > >> potential operational gaps of the interaction are also described. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> The IETF Secretariat > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > ipv6@ietf.org > > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
