All, I compiled the suggested changes.
Thanks. ----- A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6man-addr-select- opt-09.txt has been successfully submitted by Arifumi Matsumoto and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt Revision: 09 Title: Distributing Address Selection Policy using DHCPv6 Creation date: 2013-04-25 Group: 6man Number of pages: 10 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-09.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-09 Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-09 Abstract: RFC 6724 defines default address selection mechanisms for IPv6 that allow nodes to select an appropriate address when faced with multiple source and/or destination addresses to choose between. The RFC 6724 allowed for the future definition of methods to administratively configure the address selection policy information. This document defines a new DHCPv6 option for such configuration, allowing a site administrator to distribute address selection policy overriding the default address selection parameters and policy table, and thus control the address selection behavior of nodes in their site. 2013/4/5 Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net> > All, > Given the involvement of DHCPv6 in this draft, I requested a review > by the DHC WG. The following is the feedback received. I would like to > see these issues resolved soon and encourage the authors to engage the DHC > reviewers as needed. > > Regards, > Brian > > ---- > > There was a request from an Int Area Directory to have "dhcp" review of > the draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-**opt document. Based on a review by Ted > Lemon, Tomek Mrugalski, and Bernie Volz, the following issues were raised: > > > 1. The text regarding the prefix in the OPTION_ADDRSEL_TABLE option needs > to be improved - it currently allows someone to send all 16 octets rather > than the "minimum" required - int(prefix-len+7)/8). Please see > http://datatracker.ietf.org/**doc/draft-ietf-dhc-option-**guideline<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-option-guideline>, > 5.3. Option with IPv6 prefix. > > 2. Section 3 should be dropped. This is a standard "other configuration > option" and the client and server requirements for these are best left to > RFC 3315. The current text has some mistakes and omissions if it were to > duplicate what RFC 3315 already explains, and doing so risks > inconsistencies, omissions, or conflicts which are best avoided. > ------------------------------**------------------------------**-------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/ipv6<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> > ------------------------------**------------------------------**-------- >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
