See my previous response. Sent from my iPad
On 2013-05-23, at 1:27 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Again, completely wrong for the same reason that Erratum 3630 is wrong. > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > On 23/05/2013 15:59, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6874, >> "Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Address Literals and Uniform Resource >> Identifiers". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6874&eid=3631 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Michael Sweet <msw...@apple.com> >> >> Section: 4 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> An HTTP client, proxy, or other intermediary MUST remove any ZoneID >> attached to an outgoing URI, as it has only local significance at the >> sending host. >> >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> An HTTP client, proxy, or other intermediary MUST retain any ZoneID >> attached to an outgoing URI, as it will be the only way for an HTTP server >> to return a URI containing a link-local address that can subsequently be >> used by the HTTP client. >> >> >> Notes >> ----- >> The original advice ignores a very real issue: HTTP Servers that generate >> URIs from the client's Host: need to include the Client's zoneid in order >> for the link local address to be usable/routable. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC6874 (draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-06) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Address Literals >> and Uniform Resource Identifiers >> Publication Date : February 2013 >> Author(s) : B. Carpenter, S. Cheshire, R. Hinden >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : IPv6 Maintenance >> Area : Internet >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
