On 08/13/2013 06:01 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote: > Brian, > > Good point. I will add MIPv6, Shim6 and 2 for experimental use in the next > version. > > But is "No Next Header" really a header? For the purposes of this document, I > don't think that it is.
Why not just avoid counting, note that some "ext headers were specified in [RFC2460] and others in subsequent RFCs", and point to the corresponding (upcoming) IANA registry for ext headers? Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
